Writing

Notes.

Against the hype

I am not anti-AI. I use it every day. What I am against is the theater: the demo that never meets real data, the strategy deck that is really a press release.

Here is the unglamorous part nobody wants to fund. The AI is only as good as what is underneath it: clean identity, governed events, honest context. That work does not demo well, which is exactly why it gets skipped.

Use deterministic systems where you need predictability. Use probabilistic ones where judgment helps. Anyone with one answer for both is selling you something.

Don’t outsource your thinking

The problem with AI is not that it gets things wrong. It gets things wrong in perfect prose, confidently, and most people have stopped checking.

Critical thinking was already in decline before the models arrived. Now there is a machine that will do your reasoning for you and call it a day. Every time you accept its first answer, the muscle gets weaker.

Use the tools. Then argue with them. The moment you cannot explain why an answer is right, you do not know anything. You just have output.

What the new age asks of us

Every technology wave promises the same thing: thinking is now optional. It never is. The thinking just moves somewhere harder.

The people with leverage will be the ones who can tell signal from noise, who build systems instead of depending on them, who stay curious when the machine offers the easy answer.

That means judging the output, caring whether it is right, and taking responsibility for it. That has always been the work.

← All chapters